HomeNews

Heads up: 418th FLTS wraps up new pilot display tests

The view of the wash rack on the Edwards flight line through the Replacement Head-Up Display on an a C-17 Globemaster III. The Air Force is looking to see if the RHUD can supplant the legacy display with a newer, more capable version. (U.S. Air Force photo by Kyle Larson)

The view of the wash rack on the Edwards flight line through the Replacement Head-Up Display on an a C-17 Globemaster III. The Air Force is looking to see if the RHUD can supplant the legacy display with a newer, more capable version. (U.S. Air Force photo by Kyle Larson)

One of two Replacement Head-Up Displays installed on an Edwards C-17 Globemaster III for testing. The new system has an advanced optical design with a wide field of view. The RHUD computer also has enhanced processing and graphic capabilities. The RHUD is also designed to be installed and removed easier for maintenance. (U.S. Air Force photo by Kyle Larson)

One of two Replacement Head-Up Displays installed on an Edwards C-17 Globemaster III for testing. The new system has an advanced optical design with a wide field of view. The RHUD computer also has enhanced processing and graphic capabilities. The RHUD is also designed to be installed and removed easier for maintenance. (U.S. Air Force photo by Kyle Larson)

Karen Sanchez, Human Systems Integration engineer, and Matt Osburn, 418th Flight Test Squadron C-17 lead Engineer, sit in the cockpit of a C-17 Globemaster III with new Replacement Head-Up Displays installed for testing. (U.S. Air Force photo by Kyle Larson)

Karen Sanchez, 418th Flight Test Squadron Human Systems Integration engineer, and Matt Osburn, 418th FLTS C-17 lead engineer, sit in the cockpit of a C-17 Globemaster III with new Replacement Head-Up Displays installed for testing. (U.S. Air Force photo by Kyle Larson)

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. -- The 418th Flight Test Squadron is finishing up tests on a new head-up display for the C-17 Globemaster III this week.

The Air Force wants to see if the Replacement Head-Up Display can supplant the legacy display with a newer, more capable version.

For the three-week test, the C-17 Integrated Test Team installed RHUDs on an Edwards C-17 for a second round of testing. The C-17 ITT teamed up with pilots from Air Mobility Command Test and Evaluation Squadron Detachment 3 and operational pilots from Travis Air Force Base, California, who provided an early look into operational use, according to Steve Salas, 418th FLTS project manager.

 
The current HUD is being replaced due to obsolescence said Robert Getsfred, who is the acquisition program manager from Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

The C-17 RHUD is larger and has more clarity of symbology than the Legacy HUD.

“It provides a larger field of view with a sharper image, which can provide decreased pilot workload to analyze information in the HUD,” said Maj. Daniel Edelstein, 418th FLTS test pilot.

According to Elbit Systems of America, the RHUD is designed to be installed and removed easier for maintenance and includes other enhancements.

The 418th FLTS collected data from both flight and ground tests along with human systems integration surveys from pilots. The Air Force will review the compiled data in the future to see if the RHUD is suitable to replace the legacy C-17 HUDs, which is close to 30 years old.

USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.

News Search